Religion Accroding to Class Structure :: Islam Religion Religious Class Essays

Religion Accroding to frame Structure In The Arab World Society, Culture and State, Halim Barakat discusses the effect morality has on society within the Arab world. Religion is the most world-shaking force shaping marrow Eastern societies, For Barakat (119). This is because religion is both revolutionary and pacifying. The Middle East is divided into rigid social and economic structures, which creates tension among upper and lowers classes. One tries to bear on a system of inequality, which forces the other(a) to cope with poverty. Religion is utilize to serve the needs of both classes, to repress and to resist repression, in this way (130). The duality of religion can help explain the way modern societies in the Middle East function. Over the course of time, Islamic conquests resulted in the accumulation of a expectant deal of money in the hands of Muslims, so they lost the purity of the prophet (133). This divided society into classes the rich were subject with the ir status but the brusque were not. Religion was used to,perpetuate the richs existence as a class. The economic hardship the poor faced was warrant through religion and the porta of a better afterlife. Egypts twenty four di exigents, for example, were divided between the king, the military and the princes, leaving no land for the plurality. To prune his class status, the king told the people they did have land It was the twenty fifth district, and its place is in the kingdom of heaven (134). In this instance the king used religion as a coercive and repressive force, to serve his intentions (129). Rationalizing the poors poverty and the richs power through religion was a way Muslim rulers legitimize(d) and maintain(ed) the prevailing order (129). The way classes in the middle east practice religion is highly illustrative of class difference. Barakat makes a note between what he labels formalized religion, and popular religion the former is practiced in rich, urban areas, and the latter in less affluent, rural ones (126). He says authoritative religion stresses the value of strict interpretations of religious texts, monotheism, an absence of intermediaries between believers and God, and a close connection between religion and the ruling class. Popular religion, on the other hand, values interpretations of religious texts, personified saintly forces, spiritual inner selves, and does seek intermediaries between believers and God.Religion Accroding to Class Structure Islam Religion Religious Class EssaysReligion Accroding to Class Structure In The Arab World Society, Culture and State, Halim Barakat discusses the effect religion has on society within the Arab world. Religion is the most significant force shaping Middle Eastern societies, For Barakat (119). This is because religion is both revolutionary and pacifying. The Middle East is divided into rigid social and economic structures, which creates tension between upper and lowers classes. One tries to perpetuate a system of inequality, which forces the other to cope with poverty. Religion is used to serve the needs of both classes, to repress and to resist repression, in this way (130). The duality of religion can help explain the way modern societies in the Middle East function. Over the course of time, Islamic conquests resulted in the accumulation of a great deal of money in the hands of Muslims, so they lost the purity of the prophet (133). This divided society into classes the rich were content with their status but the poor were not. Religion was used to,perpetuate the richs existence as a class. The economic hardship the poor faced was justified through religion and the possibility of a better afterlife. Egypts twenty four districts, for example, were divided between the king, the military and the princes, leaving no land for the people. To justify his class status, the king told the people they did have land It was the twenty fifth district, and its place is in the kingdom of heaven (134). In this instance the king used religion as a coercive and repressive force, to serve his intentions (129). Rationalizing the poors poverty and the richs power through religion was a way Muslim rulers legitimize(d) and maintain(ed) the prevailing order (129). The way classes in the middle east practice religion is highly illustrative of class difference. Barakat makes a distinction between what he labels official religion, and popular religion the former is practiced in rich, urban areas, and the latter in less affluent, rural ones (126). He says official religion stresses the value of strict interpretations of religious texts, monotheism, an absence of intermediaries between believers and God, and a close connection between religion and the ruling class. Popular religion, on the other hand, values interpretations of religious texts, personified sacred forces, spiritual inner selves, and does seek intermediaries between believers and God.