Police and Victims Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Police and Victims - Case Study ExampleIn Australia, there are two levels of police forces, the state police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The AFP is only 25 years old whilst State Police upshots were established in the 1800sThe Australasian Institute of Policing (AIPol) is a non-industrial, not-for-profit corporal association that has been established by practitioners, for practitioners to further the policing profession. As such, it is the professional body for Australian and bare-assed Zealand policing and has been established with the object toThe New South Wales Police gist (NSW Police Force previously New South Wales Police Service & New South Wales Police) is the primary law enforcement agency in the State of New South Wales, Australia. (ASHWORTH, A 1987) It is an agency of the Government of New South Wales inwardly the New South Wales Ministry for Police. Divided into eighty Local Area Commands (LAC),1 the NSW Police Force consists of over five hundred local p olice stations and covers an area of 801,600 square kilometres whilst serving the states population of seven million people.2Under the Police principle Act (1862), the organisation of the New South Wales Police Force was formally established in 1862 with the unification of all existing independent police units within New South Wales. The authority and responsibility of the entire police force was given to the Inspector General of Police.3 Presently, the Commissioner of Police controls the police force.Crime and Justice form in AustraliaThe Commonwealth of Australia is federalist government composed of a national government and six State governments. The government of the Commonwealth is responsible for the enforcement of its own laws. The most a great deal prosecuted Commonwealth offenses are those related to the importation of drugs and the violation of social security laws. Offenses against a person or against property occurring in Commonwealth facilities are overly regarded a s offenses against the Commonwealth. The States are primarily responsible for the development of venomous law. Queensland, Western Australia, and Tasmania are described as code States because they have enacted criminal codes which define the limits of the criminal law. The remaining three States, New South Wales, Victoria,and South Australia are regarded as common law States because they have not attempted codification. In practice, however, there is lilliputian ifference in the elements of the criminal law between the code and common law States. Local governments can pass